Showing posts with label consent. Show all posts
Showing posts with label consent. Show all posts

Monday, 21 September 2015

The Importance Of Teaching Consent

The Importance Of Teaching ConsentIf you've been reading my blog for a while, you might remember I wrote a post about victim blaming. If not, you can read it here. I mentioned consent in that post, but didn't go into, so today I thought I would talk about the importance of teaching young people about consent.

Firstly, I believe that obtaining consent is important at any age, but I think as adults, we are more equipped to communicate successfully non-verbally.

I think teaching teenagers about consent is one of the most important things you can teach them.

I'm sure sex ed in schools has moved on drastically since I was there, and perhaps now consent is covered in more detail. When I was at school, it was summed up as "girls, just say no" and that was it!

Whether or not this is taught in schools, I think every parent should cover it whenever they believe their child is old enough to understand the meaning. Often in schools, by the time these things are taught, it's too late.

I know parents don't want to think their teenagers are having sex, but in some cases they are. It's better that they are equipped with the facts.

It's not enough to teach a girl to "just say no".

Imagine two people. They have been together a couple of months. They are kissing, and he moves his hand towards her panties. She half heartedly pushes his hand away and mumbles "we shouldn't". She looks down, bites her lip and swallows hard. He tries again. She pushes his hand away again, maybe she even giggles a bit. She say's quietly "it's not right."

An adult male would get the impression from this that she doesn't want to go any further. If he has any decency about him, at this point, he will stop.

Now imagine he's 15.

Body language probably isn't his strong point at this stage, especially if they have had a few drinks.

His hormones will be going wild.

Even the most decent teenager can justify this as she wanted to really, she was just too shy to admit it, she was laughing. And the crucial part - she didn't say no!

It is essential to teach girls that if they don't want things to go further they must use the word "no".

Equally important, is to teach them how to say no.

There is a world of difference between a girl giggling and saying "no, we shouldn't" and looking someone in the face and saying "no, I don't want to".

Assuming the boy she is with is a decent person with even minimal morals (because if he isn't, nothing she says is going to stop him), the second phrase will make him stop. The first phrase sounds like she wants him to persuade her.

I don't think the full responsibility of this lies with girls' parents.

I believe that parents of boys should be teaching them that no means no means no. End of. Not "I'm open persuasion" not "Just do it anyway" but no.

Teach him that if at any point she uses the word no, he must stop immediately.

Teach him that the grey areas are rarely grey.

They are, more often than not, a girl so wrapped up in the boy that she doesn't want to tell him no and risk losing him.

A girl desperate for him to hear the no behind the giggling and the gentle hand pushing.

A girl that wants to hear it's ok to wait.

Teach him that one simple phrase can save a lot of heart ache. Even if she isn't saying no and she seems totally into it. The simple phrase being "Are you sure you want to do this? We can stop anytime you want."

By asking this question and getting an answer, there is now consent without pressure.

Are you the parent of a teenager or pre-teen? Have you taught this lesson yet? If so, how did you go about it? Do you feel it is covered well enough in schools? Let me know in the comments :)

You can find me here: Twitter Bloglovin Pinterest and Instagram Please do stop by and say hi!


Zenas Suitcase
The Blog Centre Showcase Tuesday
Super Busy Mum
Let's Talk Mommy
http://viewfrominhere.com/waywow-linkup-14-new-rules-all-posts-welcome/
Brilliant blog posts on HonestMum.com
Domesticated Momster
Binky Linky
Life with Baby Kicks
The Dad Network
thumbnailsize
Stopping at two

Thursday, 19 March 2015

50 Shades Of Grey: The Movie Vs The Book 19th March 2015

On February 16th I wrote a post on this blog (50 shades of publicity) about the 50 Shades franchise. This is a follow up to that one so may be worth looking at it to get a bit of context.
I have finally gotten around to watching the movie, and I must say it was not at all what I was expecting. Whilst the term thought provoking may be a stretch, it did make me think.
In the original post, I wrote that some women's rights groups are opposed to this movie as it is derogatory to women and portrays an abusive relationship. I disagreed with that as a dom/sub relationship is consenting.
After watching the movie, I sort of see where they are coming from, and how, if they haven't read the book, this could be misinterpreted. The book is written from Ana's point of view, and throughout we have the voice of Ana's "inner Goddess". Now when reading the book, this inner voice drove me mad, however, when watching the movie, I understood its importance. This inner voice described Ana's feelings. It let the reader know that she was enjoying being dominated. Without this narrative, the movie lacks the feel of enjoyment on her part.
For all she has been seen to consent, the movie gave me the impression she was just going along with what Christian wanted because she was afraid to lose him. In the book, it came across as her being treated like a princess, in the movie it came across as her being treated like a cheap sex toy at times.
*Spoiler alert* Also, I think the big thing for women's rights groups would be the punishment scene at the end. In the movie, that had the distinct feeling of domestic abuse. Ana was crying, clearly uncomfortable and he just kept on.
I think "punishment" is one thing in a sexual context if you both enjoy it. However, when you are being beaten for rolling your eyes, or saying something the man doesn't like, it's perhaps a little more than that.
I'm not sure if the movie was done this way on purpose to make it a bit more sensationalist, or if it just somewhat missed the mark, but I got a very different feel from it than the book.
I do still stand by the point that it's fictional though, and can see no real reason why it should be banned. I also still think all these women's rights groups are giving it added publicity.
Check out my other blog lovelifeandeverydaythings.blogspot.com and feel free to comment :)